Duplicate entries of 'Subject for Allegations' on Allegations record in HR Employee Relations caseIssue In the Xanadu and Yokohama releases, if the Subject of Allegation field is manually populated while creating an Allegation record, duplicate Subject of Allegation entries may be created. However, if the field is left blank, no duplicates occur—the business rule auto-populates the field correctly without creating redundant records. In contrast, in the Washington DC release, manually filling in the Subject of Allegation field results in only one corresponding Subject of Allegation entry, with no duplication. Steps to reproduce: Impersonate as an HR ER case admin.Open an HR ER case.Go to the Allegations tab.Click New.In the 'Subject of Allegation' tab, add a row. Notice, only the person in 'Involved parties' with 'Subject of Allegation' type can be selected.Complete the rest of the fields in the 'Allegations' page.Save or submit the form.Notice there are two associated allegation records in the 'Subject of Allegation' tabReleaseXanadu and YokohamaCauseIn the Xanadu release, we introduced a business rule on the Allegation table to automatically populate the Subject of Allegation field: Business Rule Table: Allegation (sn_hr_er_allegation)Business Rule Name: Populate subject of allegation Hence, if users add the 'Subject for allegation' manually, the business rule will populate duplicate entries. We’ve also updated the product documentation to reflect this change: Washington DC Release:HR ER: Create an Allegation – Washington DCXanadu and Later Releases:HR ER: Create an Allegation – Xanadu+ The updated documentation notes: If an Involved Parties record of type Subject of Allegation exists, the Subject of Allegation field in the allegation record is auto-populated, provided that only one subject of allegation exists. ResolutionDue to the new auto-population functionality, users should adjust their process and avoid manually creating the Subject of Allegation record, as this will now be handled automatically by the business rule.