The sn_apm.apm_analyst role contains the sn_apm.apm_admin; this looks like a defectDescriptionThe role sn_apm.apm_admin has the highest privilegesThe role sn_apm.apm_analyst has the second highest privilegesThe role sn_apm.apm_analyst contains the role sn_apm.apm_admin. This does not make sense. Could you please confirm that this is the case?Release or EnvironmentAnyCauseExpected behaviorResolutionIn Application Portfolio Management (APM), Analyst is the super role. Admin generally has all the administration-related roles. But key features related to scores can be only accessible by Analyst. So, for Analyst along with Admin access analysts have access to scores and their related behavior. APM doesn't allow APM admins to modify the scores as Admins are generally not aware of that functionality. Based on the docs, it is expected behavior.Business stakeholder role for APMInstalled with Application Portfolio ManagementAnalyst (sn_apm.apm_analyst) role in Application Portfolio Management is a licensable role that requires a subscription. Users with this role can access all APM PA dashboards, roadmaps, program workbench, and all the associated pages and tables. Moreover, this role contains IT program manager, IT portfolio manager, IT demand manager, and APM administrator roles who have different levels of access not only to read but to approve and update information data.Rather than going with the name, these roles have been designed for different personas with different functionalities.The sn_apm.apm_analyst is more of an Analyst License role and sn_apm.apm_admin is a Planned License role.