<h2>Queries related to Software Normalization ("Normalized Display name" and "Normalized" checkbox)</h2><br/><div style="overflow-x:auto"><article><div ><h3 >Issue </h3><section><ul><li>Why the "Normalized display name" on the software installation record, is not a concatenation of the normalized values ?<br /><br /></li><li>What is the purpose of the "Normalized" checkbox on the records under "cmdb_sam_sw_install" table ?<br /><br /><img src="/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=ae0b65b8db3be0101cd8a345ca961979" width="949" height="313" /><br /></li></ul></section></div><div ><h3 >Release</h3><section><ul><li>Paris and below</li></ul></section></div><div ><h3 >Resolution</h3><section><ul><li>It is observed that the "Normalized display name" is the same as the "Display name" for the records under "cmdb_sam_sw_install" table. Why the "Normalized display name" is not a concatenation of the normalized values ?<br /><br /> <ul><li>The concatenation feature is added in Quebec. For pre Quebec releases, it's a legacy column. So it's expected to have that field the same as "Display name".<br /><br /></li></ul> </li><li>What is the purpose of the "Normalized" checkbox on the records under "cmdb_sam_sw_install" table ?<br /><br /> <ul><li>"Normalized" is a legacy column, and it is not used anymore.</li></ul> </li></ul></section></div></article></div>