Reference Fields that have false dependency results in bug with reference fieldDescription<!-- div.margin { padding: 10px 40px 40px 30px; } table.tocTable { border: 1px solid; border-color: #e0e0e0; background-color: #fff; } .title { color: #d1232b; font-weight: normal; font-size: 28px; } h1 { color: #d1232b; font-weight: normal; font-size: 21px; margin-bottom: 5px; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #cccccc; } h2 { color: #646464; font-weight: bold; font-size: 18px; } h3 { color: #000000; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16px; } h4 { color: #666666; font-weight: bold; font-size: 15px; } h5 { color: #000000; font-weight: bold; font-size: 13px; } h6 { color: #000000; font-weight: bold; font-size:14px; } ul, ol { margin-left: 0; list-style-position: outside; } --> Symptoms No results are shown when you click on the search icon for reference field on a table. The dictionary record for the reference field is "dependent" on a nonexistent field. Release All Release Cause Reference fields which have dependency on nonexistent values will result in a blank list. Resolution Go to the dictionary entry list for the reference field which is affectedConfigure list layout and add in the fields "dependent" & "dependent on field", saveNotice that there is a value in the dependent field and delete the value (If this dictionary entry is in fact dependent on another field, make sure you have the correct field value).Test that the reference fields qualifiers now work.